|
|
|
|
Table of contents The impact of structured authoring on a publishing workflow Developing a business case for structured authoring and XML Does your organization need structure? |
Workflow optionsXML and structured authoring do not provide an actual workflow; they must be incorporated into a complete workflow. Before establishing a structured publishing workflow, you should consider the following tasks:
Defining content sourcesIt’s important to examine existing content to establish how it is currently developed and how it will benefit from structure. Other questions include the following:
The following table shows a simplified audit of content:
Establishing content repositoriesA content repository or database is not required to work in XML. However, a content repository makes it possible to manage content modules, which allows you to do the following:
XML works very well with content repositories; as a text format, XML is easier to manage than the proprietary binary formats of word-processing programs. Structured authoring improves consistency across documents. This makes it easier to manage them in a content repository. Content can be automatically chunked at specified element levels, which makes content reuse easier (Figure 12).
Implementing content reuseContent reuse, or single sourcing, doesn’t require an XML-based workflow. In XML, though, it’s easier to enforce the consistency that’s required to make content reuse work. Content reuse means that you develop a particular chunk of information once, and then use it wherever it’s needed. Reuse can occur across media—for example, a chunk of content is used in both the printed manual and in the online help for a product. In other cases, you might write a chunk of information that’s needed in several different printed books. Reusing that chunk minimizes maintenance and ensures consistency across all of the information products (Figure 13).
Delivering formatted outputStructured authoring separates structure and formatting; this provides both the greatest advantage and the greatest challenge in the structured environment. Authors are accustomed to working in a visual environment. Requiring them to work solely with tags is impractical, yet providing an approximation of the final output’s appearance will bias them toward a particular medium. For example, an authoring environment that looks something like a printed page makes it more difficult to consider how content will function in an online help format. Figure 14 outlines how structured information is processed to produce the final deliverable documents in specific formats. Instead of working with commercial authoring applications, some XML developers prefer to use open-source tools. While it is possible to create print and PDF output from open-source solutions, it is generally easier to do so through commercial tools (which tend to produce higher-quality output).
Next page:
Copyright © 2008 Scriptorium Publishing Services, Inc. All rights reserved. |